Steve Best says that “the only measure of value in capitalism is exchange value, not the intrinsic value of life.”
Exchange value enriches life. It makes travel possible; enables us to buy food at the supermarket; to communicate across the world by email; and even to work at universities decrying capitalism.
As i mentioned in my last post, Ayn Rand tells us in The Objectivist Ethics, that “The principle of trade is the only rational ethical principle for all human relationships, personal and social, private and public, spiritual and material. It is the principle of justice.”
As such, a measure of value in capitalism is certainly exchange value, whether that’s of tyres or tofu.
But is exchange value the only measure?
No. In fact, to arrive at capitalism as a social system, and to arrive at morality before that, there must be an ultimate standard of value. And that ultimate standard of value, contrary to Steve, is life.
Any action that disregards the value of life is not capitalism, but a flawed understanding of it.
Academics that see a problem with animal use often oppose capitalism.
Their opposition ranges from disapproval to outright hostility.
However, harmful results have occurred all over the world, regardless of political system, with some of the worst results in systems that disavowed capitalism.
Communism, for example, was responsible for over 90 million deaths last century.
Continue reading Anti-capitalism
As my first post here suggests, Society VX, my upcoming book, draws heavily on the work of Ayn Rand.
She wasn’t an academic, although could have been. But she probably didn’t see any benefit in becoming one, since she’d already made her own path and disagreed with much of what academia offered up (in the humanities).
Continue reading The Purpose of Society VX
Society VX is the name of the book i have scheduled for release this month.
It aims to integrate a broad current of general and social philosophy—as represented by the work of Ayn Rand—with veganism.
You may be inclined to dismiss Ayn Rand by reputation. This is something i’d caution you not to do. The reputation she has of being a cranky old advocate of the rich who has no interest in the poor, is a slight on her understanding of society.
Certainly, there have been ‘cranky’ episodes in her history. But to focus only on this is to throw out the baby with the bathwater—a horrible thought.